Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 25d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

haha as if anybody would bet on me :P

  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 25d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

haha keg tossing fools with words, perhaps?

  • Like 1
  • Feeling the Love :-)
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 13y 4m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Not in Cairns anymore
Posted (edited)

@k31th

52 seconds in and the presenter supports my case

Quote: "the best way to create a fossil is to trap and quickly bury a dead organism"

 

we can have an open minded discussion without calling each other fools :aaggl:

Edited by bloodycrashboy
  • Feeling the Love :-)
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 13y 4m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Not in Cairns anymore
Posted
8 hours ago, k31th said:

"rapid burial" is just an over-arching term for a bunch of possible situations that could cause a fossil to be preserved.

 

yes there are a few other types of fossils but the overwhelming fossil evidence is from rapid burial

here is an article supporting the flood of the Bible

I don't expect you to read it in it's entirety, but a quick scan will give you the idea 

https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/the-fossil-record-1/

 

I have been accused in the past as having a closed mind to science based on the fact that I believe the Bibles account of creation

this is not so, I love science

Just for the record, I did watch the second video

my conclusion: far to over simplified, maybe primary school level (no offence to you Keith)

 

the problem is that we both come to separate conclusions based on differing presuppositions 

as with one of my good friends, we may have to agree to disagree 

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 11y 3m 13d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Canberra ACT
Posted
source for this?
Read it recently in a book "Case for Faith". But is a quote from mathematical physicist Robert Griffiths.
  • Like 1
  • Bob the Freaking Builder
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 16y 10m 22d
  • Gender: Female
  • Location: SA
Posted

I will not weigh in with my personal views too much as I believe anyone who sprooks their own beliefs unwaveringly is naive and uneducated due to the fact that both sides present a somewhat valid argument and neither side can fully disprove each other, therefore common sense dictates you can’t come to a difinitive conclusion. 

 

I don’t believe anyone truly knows the answers.... but I will say that atheists are the new stereotypical Jehovas Witnesses... feels like they knock on everyone’s metaphorical door and shove their beliefs down everyone’s throat. (Not sayin that’s what’s happening here as discussion is always a good thing) ... but it feels like no matter the evidence they unwaiveringly deny any notion of a god or greater being... and to me... that’s the most naive viewpoint of all. 

  • Like 1
  • Is on holiday from communism
  • Member
  • Member For: 7y 7m 2d
  • Gender: Female
  • Location: Victoria
Posted

I wish I had a dinosaur to drive to work. That would be epic.

 

😔 but I'm poor and can't buy one

 

What she said, no one knows the answer. History can easily be manipulated. Just enjoy your short miserable existence on this earth for 70 years and die.

 

Be nice to cats,  they rule the underworld.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...