Rab WOT? Legacy Donating Member 10,981 Member For: 13y 5m 11d Gender: Male Location: Frankston, 3199 Posted 10/05/16 12:07 AM Posted 10/05/16 12:07 AM
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 30,020 Member For: 18y 3m 26d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 10/05/16 12:21 AM Posted 10/05/16 12:21 AM How long do you suggest? It's currently 10min...
Rab WOT? Legacy Donating Member 10,981 Member For: 13y 5m 11d Gender: Male Location: Frankston, 3199 Posted 10/05/16 12:32 AM Posted 10/05/16 12:32 AM Remove the limit totally would be my preference. Haven't really seen a problem on other forums where the content is able to be changed after the original post.
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 30,020 Member For: 18y 3m 26d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 10/05/16 12:44 AM Posted 10/05/16 12:44 AM Hmm something to consider. Ultimately it's not my decision to remove the time limit altogether... I'm of the opinion that 10min is more than enough to proof read what you've just posted (hopefully a 2nd time - first one should be before you hit the submit post button ) and any other thoughts/information can just go in a new post after the time limit is up. 1. This way your post count is higher. 2. We are not concerned with the database size for posts specifically. 3. Threads of discussion are clearer more often than not this way. 4. More mocking occurs for mistakes made (and general banter from that). I think it improves the forum when you can't undo your stuff-ups Of course moderators and CCs need the unlimited time to clean up threads and correct information within posts. One obvious example of unlimited editing is WhingePool, and I personally find it annoying that conversation flow gets so interrupted/changed at any moment over there.
JETURBO ...JD TUNING ADELAIDE... Legacy Donating Member 23,708 Member For: 18y 2m 5d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 10/05/16 01:07 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:07 AM 30 min would be handy especially when I f*ck around with hosting piks in my thread etc etc 1
Rab WOT? Legacy Donating Member 10,981 Member For: 13y 5m 11d Gender: Male Location: Frankston, 3199 Posted 10/05/16 01:12 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:12 AM Or till 1pm Sunday afternoon when I re-read what I wrote in the hours of an intoxicated night before 3
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 30,020 Member For: 18y 3m 26d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 10/05/16 01:15 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:15 AM LOL'd 5 minutes ago, JETURBO said: 30 min would be handy especially when I f*ck around with hosting piks in my thread etc etc Haha just don't hit "submit post" until it's all hosted and typed/copy-pasted into the box?
MurdoK Legacy Donating Member 719 Member For: 16y 1m 15d Gender: Male Location: Perth,WA Posted 10/05/16 01:20 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:20 AM Preview post option?
k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 30,020 Member For: 18y 3m 26d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 10/05/16 01:29 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:29 AM The whole "preview" thing is a holdover from the old version of the forum software. The idea of the html compatible "editor box" is that it's a WYSIWYG editor so the contents you see should be exactly how the post comes out once submitted. (as long as you're using a browser and not an app like Tapatalk, of course ) this editor type renders the old "preview" method obsolete.
JETURBO ...JD TUNING ADELAIDE... Legacy Donating Member 23,708 Member For: 18y 2m 5d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 10/05/16 01:33 AM Posted 10/05/16 01:33 AM I get the principle keif but being able to edit greater than 10 min isn't a massive ask really is it ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now