Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • RNS10S
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 19y 11m 29d
  • Gender: Male
Posted

fark using e85 then.

Compared to 98 there would be hardly any difference to cost if your car is setup for it.

I do 5-600 klms a week and it costs me less than when I was on 98.

So fark using 98...lol

P100 would be best but the monkeys are now phasing it out, and with the price increase of Race Blend 98 wil be cheaper then e85 so eflex is the winner.

But its not as readily available so no win there either, gonna get a farken diesel next.

  • Like 1
  • Member
  • Member For: 23y 4m 15d
  • Gender: Male
Posted

The smell is pharkin annoying after a while. Follows you everywhere.

You need a petrol tanker to follow you everywhere otherwise you are filling up every second day and you just can't fill up anywhere.

For me stop/start driving seemed to drink 25l/100km. It was very expensive for me compared to 98.

It will chew out your pumps/filters.

The bigger pumps and injectors do affect the way the car drives. I certainly don't want to listen to pumps if I can avoid it.

You have to put up with the Indian petrol station teller mumbling on about whether you have put the right fuel in your car.

Its good for a 600+rwhp beast but up to 500rwhp just stick to 98.

Someone else can put up the benefits like an increase in torque (if we havn't got enough already)

  • Member
  • Member For: 14y 1m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Adelaide S.A
Posted

Rednose do you actually have better efficiency on 98. My car is full set up for e85. Hoses lines and all. Im going for a 98 retune so I can run 2 tunes. Definitely hoping for better mileage on 98 lol

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 15y 24d
Posted

I've found the same. When I was on 98 I was doing 13 per hundred now eflex it is at least 22. No difference in driving just more power, and my in car is telling me I'm doing 16 per hundred but it has no idea

  • Member
  • Member For: 14y 1m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Adelaide S.A
Posted

My trip is saying im doing 13 per hundred on e85. Which is complete bs in my opinion. Do these computers adapt when u change pumps and fuel etc? Or is it a generic approximate. Always wanted to know

  • RNS10S
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 19y 11m 29d
  • Gender: Male
Posted

Rednose do you actually have better efficiency on 98. My car is full set up for e85. Hoses lines and all. Im going for a 98 retune so I can run 2 tunes. Definitely hoping for better mileage on 98 lol

No I don't have better efficiency nor do I get better mileage, but being that e-flex is nearly 40c per litre cheaper it costs me similar money to run the car.

I've found the same. When I was on 98 I was doing 13 per hundred now eflex it is at least 22. No difference in driving just more power, and my in car is telling me I'm doing 16 per hundred but it has no idea

The ICC is programmed to suit the standard injectors so it will not read true if you have changed your injectors.

  • Like 1
  • Member
  • Member For: 14y 1m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Adelaide S.A
Posted

Interesting. Im guessing it doesnt take into account e85 either

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 21y 1m 6d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: OZ
Posted

Mine reads as true on e85 as it does on PULP. It should be ballpark.

  • Like 3
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 13y 6m 20d
Posted (edited)

Does anyone know if the tune needs to be touched up once they roll out the race blend E85 .

Edited by LU82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...