Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 9y 11m 14d
Posted

Lol not unheard of in jap cars getting 100kw gains from a decent cam setup

  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

*on a falcon

 

was not referring to any car other than a BA-FG turbocharged falcon, to be clear.

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 9y 11m 14d
Posted

Lol obviously given its a ford forum and not many people go all out on barra cam setups but my point was its not unheard of in general

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 10y 11m 27d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NZ
Posted

4399adaa5d4310e97ea156038bc31b69.jpgedb54042be79988f51147837ee8452c8.jpg

E85, Typhoon. Big claims I know but this guy does have a 6 second barra remember. At the forefront of barra development.

  • Like 1
  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

I'm aware of him. I had him as a tuner on my old car. Good tuner at WOT, but anything else, nope.

 

Dyno numbers mean stuff all across two different dyno's. What else changed between those dyno runs? probably a lot more than just "I put in better cams"... surely the tune had more boost, timing etc.

 

Just the fact he felt he needed to post a single post on facesucks on this specific topic means it's probably designed to make him money or shift units from his "our spec camshafts".

  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 10y 11m 27d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NZ
Posted

a7e6fddfb46eed97a11f8fd7b3cb9a1f.jpg

Back to back runs apparently with only cams and springs changed.

  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

well, it must have been tuned to suit the new camshafts, so it's not just the camshafts... and changing of valve springs can make a motor perform MUCH better to the capability of the remaining mechanical components if it's the valve springs causing things to run average.

  • Haha 1
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 10y 11m 27d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NZ
Posted

k31thy your denial, 26psi both runs. Only so much timing you can chuck into it. #dynomitecamsfork31thy

  • Like 1
  • less WHY; more WOT
  • Site Developer
  • Member For: 18y 3m 19d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

perhaps I'm just skeptical and/or pessimistic. I wouldn't want those cams anyway, as it moved the start of the power band from 4,000 revs right up to 5,000 and made the power curve gain height slower (e.g. feels slower).

 

The area under the curve is what feels good in a road car, so the 577 isn't that far behind right up to 6,700rpm.  Obviously after 5,500 revs the 677 is better, but how often are you going to be in this rev range :)

  • Like 1
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 10y 11m 27d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NZ
Posted

Yea you can definitely see where its lost low end power. Im tempted to buy some since im rebuilding the thing anyway, maybe I should take one for the team.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...